Nyaya (Logic) Overview

by

The Nyaya Darsana is one of the six classical schools of Indian philosophy, focusing on logic and epistemology. Within the Nyaya Darsana, there is a sub-section known as Nyaya, which further elaborates on the principles of logic and reasoning. In this article, we will delve into two major topics within the Nyaya sub-section: Anumana and Hetvabhasa.

Anumana

Anumana, also known as inference, is a method of acquiring knowledge through reasoning. It is based on the idea that certain events or properties can lead to the conclusion of other events or properties. Anumana consists of five components:

  1. Pratijna (Proposition): This is the initial statement or proposition that is being inferred. For example, “All men are mortal.”
  2. Hetu (Reason): This is the middle term that connects the proposition with the conclusion. In the example given, the reason would be “Socrates is a man.”
  3. Udaharana (Example): An example is provided to illustrate the connection between the reason and the proposition. In this case, an example could be “Socrates is a man, and all men are mortal, therefore Socrates is mortal.”
  4. Upanaya (Application): This is the application of the rule to the specific case. It involves applying the general principle to the particular instance.
  5. Nigamana (Conclusion): The final step in the process of inference is the conclusion drawn from the reasoning process. In our example, the conclusion would be “Therefore, Socrates is mortal.”

Hetvabhasa

Hetvabhasa refers to fallacies in reasoning or faulty arguments that may appear to be valid but are actually flawed. There are five types of Hetvabhasa:

  1. Sadhyasama: This fallacy occurs when the middle term in an inference is equivalent to the subject of the proposition.
  2. Viruddha: This fallacy arises when the middle term in an inference contradicts the subject of the proposition.
  3. Asiddha: This fallacy occurs when the reason provided in the inference is not established or proven.
  4. Badhita: This fallacy arises when the reason provided is not relevant to the proposition being inferred.
  5. Hrasva: This fallacy occurs when the reason provided is too weak to support the conclusion.

By understanding Anumana and Hetvabhasa within the Nyaya sub-section of the Nyaya Darsana, we gain valuable insights into the principles of logic and reasoning as elucidated by this classical school of Indian philosophy.

Got feedback? Tell us!